Chavez's policies have reduced ignorance, poverty, and injustice. The list goes on and on. Venezuelans are more engaged in the political process than anytime in the nation's history. That scares Washington. US elites don't want well-informed, empowered people participating in the political process. They believe that task should be left to the venal politicians chosen by corporate bosses and top-hat banksters. That's why Chavez has to go. He's given people hope for a better life.
Hat-tip to Neil Clark: Why Washington hates Hugo Chavez.
I take this praise of Chavez with a fairly large pinche of salt, just as I do the Washington spin on him. Yes, Washington and the US media have tried to portray him as the bad guy, without much evidence. But I'm a bit sceptical about these attempts to portray him as an altogether good guy. I suspect that, like most politicians, he is a mixture of good and bad, though in his case the good may outweigh the bad.
The main reason for my scepticism about Chavez's goodness is that he has been reported as thinking that Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe is one of the good guys. Anyone who thinks that has severely impaired political judgement, and if that is his view, then there is surely some truth in the bad vibes about him emanating from Washington.
If this is true of Chavez
Chavez's policies have reduced ignorance, poverty, and injustice. The list goes on and on. Venezuelans are more engaged in the political process than anytime in the nation's history. That scares Washington. US elites don't want well-informed, empowered people participating in the political process. They believe that task should be left to the venal politicians chosen by corporate bosses and top-hat banksters. That's why Chavez has to go. He's given people hope for a better life.
... then the opposite is true of Mugabe.
Mugabe's policies have increased ignorance, poverty, and injustice. The list goes on and on. Zimbabweans are more victimised in the political process than at any time in the nation's history, even under Smith. That's why Mugabe has to go. He's given people no hope for a better life.
It used to be said that one good thing that could be said of Mussolini was that he made the trains run on time. I doubt that Mugabe has accomplished even that. If Chavez supports a dictator like Mugabe there must be something seriously wrong with Chavez.
What's the similarity between politicians and a bunch of bananas? They're all yellow, they hang together, and there's not a straight one among them.
1 comment:
I can understand why the fact Chavez thinks Mugabe is a good guy might seem a little odd.
Thing is, thirty years ago, Mugabe WAS one of the good guys. I have a book about him published in about 1985 or so and if you read that you'd think he was a great guy.
I'm guessing Chavez refers to Mugabe's past history as a decent Marxist revolutionary who overthrew a racist regime. Perhaps he's just stirring. Either way, I can't believe he truly condones TODAY'S Zimbabwe.
I am quite an admirer of Chavez, I'll admit. I DO think what he is doing will bring positive change in Latin America. the continent certainly seems to be going through a leftist, anti-Imperialist US resurgence and Chavez is leading that.
I do think some amazing things are happening in Venezuela.
Post a Comment